Free Samples · 48h Dispatch OEM Manufacturer Since 2014 Reply Within 24h
sales@ceramitell.com · +86 151 9017 9780
Forming · Sintering · Grinding · Lapping
Process

Manufacturing process —
how we make every ceramic part.

Ceramic component manufacturing is a sequential process with no shortcuts. Raw powder → forming → sintering → grinding → finishing. Each stage has multiple route options optimized for different geometries and materials. Below is the full process map — what runs in our Hangzhou facility and how the choices shape your finished part's properties and cost.

5
Process Stages
4
Forming Routes
3
Sintering Methods
±0.005
mm Tolerance
Certifications & Standards
ISO 9001IATF 16949CERoHS · REACHUL Recognized
01 · Process Decision Matrix

Which route for which part.

Different product geometries and material grades dictate different process route choices. The matrix below shows the typical forming + sintering route for our 6 major product families. Custom routes available — DFM review identifies the right combination for your part.

Product FamilyUnitForming RouteSintering RouteFinishing
Hot Surface IgnitersBLKInjection moldingPressurelessGrind + electrical test
Precision Balls (G3–G10)ballsDry pressHIPLap + Talyrond
Grinding Media (G40+)ballsDry pressPressurelessTumble + screen
Structural PartscustomCIP or slipPressurelessDiamond grind + CMM
Armor Tiles (B₄C)tilesDry pressHot pressGrind + ballistic test
Semiconductor (CVD-SiC)ringsCVD deposition(deposited)Lap + particle scan
CVD-SiC follows a unique chemical-vapor-deposition route rather than the press-and-sinter flow. Custom processes available for non-standard geometries — contact engineering with your spec.
02 · Stage-by-Stage Detail

5 stages, step by step.

Stage 1 — Powder Preparation

In-house synthesized Si₃N₄ and ZrO₂ powders, or external high-purity Al₂O₃/SiC/AlN/BN/B₄C powders received via incoming inspection. Powder classified to target PSD, mixed with sintering aids and binder system. Output: ready-to-form powder slurry or granule.

Output → Forming-ready powder system
📐
Stage 2 — Forming (4 Routes)

CIP: isotropic pressing for tubes, rods, large parts. Slip casting: complex hollow shapes. Injection molding: complex small parts with high volume. Dry press: simple geometries at high throughput. Route choice depends on geometry, volume, and material.

Output → Green-state ceramic shape
🔥
Stage 3 — Sintering (3 Methods)

Pressureless sintering: default, lowest cost. Hot pressing (HP): higher density, used for armor tiles and dense seal faces. Hot isostatic pressing (HIP): highest density (99.5%+ theoretical), used for precision bearing balls and aerospace structural parts. Each method delivers a different density and strength outcome.

Output → Sintered dense ceramic
⚙️
Stage 4 — Diamond Grinding

Sintered ceramic is too hard for conventional metal-cutting tooling — finishing is exclusively diamond-tool grinding. Cylindrical, surface, and CNC profile grinding available. Standard tolerance ±0.005 mm; tighter tolerances (±0.002 mm) via additional lapping at extra cost.

Output → Dimension-toleranced ceramic part
Stage 5 — Lap + Polish + Inspect

Optional lapping for surface finish to Ra ≤0.02 μm (precision balls, bearing races, semiconductor components). Polishing for optical-grade surfaces. Final inspection: CMM, Talyrond, profilometer, SEM as required by product family. Lot cert generated, packaging.

Output → Finished part + lot cert + packaging
📋
DFM for Your Part

Send STEP/PDF/DWG drawing + duty profile. Our DFM team recommends the right process route within 48 hours — forming method, sintering method, finishing steps, and resulting tolerance/finish/cost outcome.

Action → engineering@ceramitell.com
03 · Why Process Choice Matters

How process choice drives outcomes.

Process Choices Affect Cost

★ Why Tooling Matters
  • Forming choice drives unit cost — Injection molding pays back at 5,000+ units; CIP works at 100 units
  • Sintering choice drives material cost — HIP costs 3× pressureless but enables G3 bearing balls; only worth it for aerospace
  • Grinding sets the tolerance bracket — Standard grinding to ±0.005mm is cheap; tighter requires lapping (more cost)
  • Finishing choice affects performance — Ra 0.02 μm vs 0.2 μm changes friction, wear, and electrical surface properties
  • QC depth scales with the spec — Semiconductor parts have particle scan; structural parts have CMM only

Process Choices Affect Performance

Quality outcomes
  • HIP sintering → 99.5% theoretical density — Eliminates voids that cause crack initiation
  • Hot press sintering → 98% density + grain control — Armor-grade B₄C requires this route
  • Pressureless sintering → 95–97% density — Adequate for most engineering applications, cheapest
  • Lapping → Ra ≤0.02 μm — Critical for bearing races, semiconductor surfaces, optical mounts
  • Diamond grinding → ±0.005 mm — Standard structural part tolerance, fits 95% of applications
★ Example · Process Optimization for New Customer

Forming route change — −30% unit cost, same finished tolerance.

A US OEM was quoting their custom Si₃N₄ structural part via CIP forming (the route that worked in their bench tests). At their target 50K units/year volume, we recommended switching to injection molding instead — the tooling investment paid back in 18 months while delivering the same finished tolerance after grinding. Their unit cost dropped 30% on the full-rate production run. Process choice isn't always obvious from the drawing alone.

Process Optimization
CIP → Injection
  • −30% Unit cost at full volume
  • 18 mo Tooling payback
  • Same Finished tolerance
  • 50K/yr Production volume